\"Then in 5 years, we can change it around again. \"
5 years? Think it will take that long?
| Warthog Territory Forums http://www.warthogterritory.net/forum/ |
|
| Re-Org http://www.warthogterritory.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=12762 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | fenderstrat72 [ 09 Jul 2008, 04:50 ] |
| Post subject: | Re-Org |
I heard that the Re-Org (back to the future) was on hold as of now? Any of you active duty guys heard anything about it? |
|
| Author: | jackb [ 09 Jul 2008, 13:58 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I haven't heard squat about it either way |
|
| Author: | prkiii [ 09 Jul 2008, 16:06 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I read an article on aim points the other day that talked about it was on hold until they reevaluated the decision.... |
|
| Author: | TheLastRaven [ 09 Jul 2008, 18:57 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yeah, the latest re-org is on hold pending review by new AF leadership. There is an article about it in the current AF Times. I have heard, though, that some overseas bases have already re-organized. I guess we will find out sooner or later (probably later) what the final plan will be. Then in 5 years, we can change it around again. --Raven |
|
| Author: | mark59 [ 09 Jul 2008, 20:48 ] |
| Post subject: | |
\"Then in 5 years, we can change it around again. \" 5 years? Think it will take that long?
|
|
| Author: | sgtgoose1 [ 10 Jul 2008, 01:20 ] |
| Post subject: | |
What now? They going back too \"TAC, SAC and MAC\"? Or is it going to be the Navy, Marine Corps, Army and Army Airforce again???? Or \"Each base has its own \"Military\"?? Gates doesn't like the USAF I feel too much. Goose |
|
| Author: | M21 Sniper [ 10 Jul 2008, 19:04 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm still not sure why they changed it from TAC/MAC/SAC to begin with. :-/ |
|
| Author: | fenderstrat72 [ 11 Jul 2008, 02:19 ] |
| Post subject: | |
sgtgoose1 wrote: What now? They going back too "TAC, SAC and MAC"? Or is it going to be the Navy, Marine Corps, Army and Army Airforce again????
Or "Each base has its own "Military"?? Gates doesn't like the USAF I feel too much. Goose Goose, the re-org of which I speak is the one that does away with AMXS and lets each fighter squadron be independent. The FS commander has ops and maintenance under his control. I feel sure you will never see TAC/SAC/MAC again. |
|
| Author: | sgtgoose1 [ 11 Jul 2008, 22:30 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Didn't they have that in the 90's in some form or another??? After working in \"CAMS, OMS, AGS, and the \"NEW AGS/OMS\" concept at Travis ???( I never really figured it out) I liked the \"AGS/AMU\" way the best. Then when you went TDY you fell under the TFS but you always had \"AMU \" supervision as a \"Firewall\" But then again the \"Squadron\" (AMU/TFS) would throw\"Parties Together\" because we were \"Family\". Does it feel like that now? Goose |
|
| Author: | TheLastRaven [ 12 Jul 2008, 06:13 ] |
| Post subject: | |
When I came in back in '01, crew chiefs, weapons and specs fell under the FS. The backshops fell under a seperate unit...CRS I believe, which also answered to the Ops Group. In July of '02 we re-organized to the Maintenance Group, with the AMUs under the AMXS, and the backshops falling under either 1 or (depending on size) squadrons. That is how it works right now...we will see how things go, though. I know we have our own re-org, aside from ops/mx going on here... --Raven |
|
| Author: | sgtgoose1 [ 13 Jul 2008, 15:45 ] |
| Post subject: | |
That would of been like , AGS, CRS,EMS, AMS and then the AMU's fell under AGS. There has been so many \"Re-Orgs\" its hard to keep track. Goose |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|