| Warthog Territory Forums http://www.warthogterritory.net/forum/ |
|
| Authors/historians: Get the A10's Name Right! http://www.warthogterritory.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3148 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | FlyingShark [ 13 May 2003, 16:57 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I was in Barnes/Nobles today and looked through all of their books on fighter/attack aircraft. The FAIRCHILD-REPUBLIC A10 came up under the following names: REPUBLIC A10 FAIRCHILD A10 LOCKHEED A10 LOCKHEED-MARTIN A10 MADE FOR A FEW SNICKERS ON MY PART. LOL. Gotta love people who don't know the first thing about the military and aircraft WRITING BOOKS about the military and aircraft... "Speed puts me in the zone." |
|
| Author: | boomer [ 13 May 2003, 22:35 ] |
| Post subject: | |
um...I've been slaving over a hot puter and doppler settings for almost 12hours now so I may have a cog or 2 freid, but isnt that list correct on all counts? "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel ! <img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0> |
|
| Author: | FlyingShark [ 14 May 2003, 07:41 ] |
| Post subject: | |
alright alright. it's correct based on the idea that the hog was a combined effort by those companies...so each gets some credit. but its a pain in the ass when you're looking for the A10 in the index of a book!!! especially when you're going through all the military aviation books and B&N's. "Speed puts me in the zone." |
|
| Author: | Dice [ 14 May 2003, 09:49 ] |
| Post subject: | |
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> Fairchild-Republic A-10 is correct, not the others. The Lockheed ones are especially annoying. Mc/I + P/A <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote> As a10stress says the only complete and proper name for the Hog is Fairchild-Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II! Farichild and Repulic was one company when the A-10 was designed and built so using one name without the other is not right. lockheed Martin is the "prime" contractor for the A-10 but that doesn't mean it's a LM aircraft, so either term Lockheed or Lockheed Martin is wrong. a10stress, I can understand your dislike of have LM name placed in frunt of the A-10 because, even if they are supporting it today they didn't design or build the Warthog. Fairchild-Republic is the reason we have the A-10 so they should never be left-out when talking about her. Ugly but well hung! http://www.warthogpen.com Edited by - Dice on May 14 2003 08:51 AM |
|
| Author: | RC-Hog [ 14 May 2003, 18:53 ] |
| Post subject: | |
The republic part is more fitting (for history atleast) when you consider that Republic Built the Tunderbolt I. |
|
| Author: | boomer [ 14 May 2003, 21:38 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I agree with all that, BUT we do have the "Lock/Mart" F-16 not the GD F-16 etc. "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel ! <img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0> |
|
| Author: | boomer [ 15 May 2003, 13:49 ] |
| Post subject: | |
yeah but we dont say GD F-16 and Lock/Mart F-16. ROFLMAO ok SOMETIMES WE DO say GD F-16!! but for a WHOLE different reason LOLOL "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel ! <img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0> |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|