Um, you mean like the F-22?
Trample the wounded- hurdle the dead.
| Warthog Territory Forums http://www.warthogterritory.net/forum/ |
|
| Super Hornet to replace all veciles in USA http://www.warthogterritory.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=2593 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | troung [ 11 Feb 2003, 17:14 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Me and Sniper came up with this. Why stop at givng the F-14 a crappy replacment. F/B-18F to replace B-52, B-1B and B-2 Slower and less agile, less payload than any of these, but much more modern. VFA-18F to replace Air Force 1 (Air Force 18) CFA-18F to replace C-130, C-141, C-17 and C-5 OF-18F to replace the O-2 ACF-18F to replace AC-130 Slower but newer. KF/A-18F to replace all KC-135s, KC-707s and KC-130s RF-18F to replace the void left by the SR-71 M/A-18F to replace M-1A1, M-2/3, M-113 and M-109 Finally faster than somehting it will replace. F/M-18F for spec ops support replacing the MD-530, MH-60, MH-47 and MC-130 EFA-18F to replace the E-2C/T and E-3 (think super hornet with a big radar on its back) F/T-18F to replace all trainers F/U-18F to replce U-2 spy planes F/AH-18F to replace AH-64D and AH-1W F/CH-18F to replace V-22, CH-47, UH-60 and Bell 212 SF-18F to replace all S-3 and P-3 for matirime partol FAV-18F to replace the AV-8B F/A-18FAG to replace all AEGIS ships EF-18G to replace the EA-6 F/A-18F to replace F-15C/E F/A-18E to replace the F-16 and A-10 Ok just joking on the last 3. Edited by - troung on Feb 11 2003 4:17 PM Edited by - troung on Feb 11 2003 4:18 PM |
|
| Author: | prkiii [ 11 Feb 2003, 17:46 ] |
| Post subject: | |
<img src=icon_smile_dissapprove.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_dissapprove.gif border=0 align=middle>This will never end<img src=icon_smile_dissapprove.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_dissapprove.gif border=0 align=middle> Brought to you by your friendly neighborhood moderator... If you can't go fast...go Ugly |
|
| Author: | M21 Sniper [ 11 Feb 2003, 18:07 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehe I can't think of a single ommision Troung, excellent job. Trample the wounded- hurdle the dead. |
|
| Author: | M21 Sniper [ 11 Feb 2003, 18:08 ] |
| Post subject: | |
WAIT!!!! You forgot about the shuttle replacement, the STS-18! Trample the wounded- hurdle the dead. |
|
| Author: | troung [ 11 Feb 2003, 18:18 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I knew I forgot one........... Fine...... SSF-18F to replace the Nuke Subs. |
|
| Author: | tritonal [ 11 Feb 2003, 19:11 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I see the humour(or lack there of<img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>) However, the days of the thoroughbred fighter are DEAD. These are no the NcNamarra days, technology has caught up that you don't comprimise anything with a multi-role aircraft. Edited by - Tritonal on Feb 11 2003 6:13 PM |
|
| Author: | M21 Sniper [ 11 Feb 2003, 19:31 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Um, you mean like the F-22?
Trample the wounded- hurdle the dead. |
|
| Author: | troung [ 11 Feb 2003, 20:17 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm not saying one plane per role, but make the multi role planes good at what thye do. |
|
| Author: | tritonal [ 11 Feb 2003, 20:24 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yes, I mean the F/A-22 I knew someone would counter with that example<img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle> |
|
| Author: | boomer [ 11 Feb 2003, 22:07 ] |
| Post subject: | |
BTW the SH with 4 tanks and a "buddy pod" holds MORE fuel than a KA-6D with 5 tanks and the internal hose reel kit, and stilll has room for 6-8 missles,pods, bombs. "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel ! <img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0> |
|
| Author: | Tomcat Tweaker [ 11 Feb 2003, 22:28 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thats looks cool for a photo shot on the ground.........In fact Horrido has a good shot of a B-1B with AIM-54's. It doesn't mean much if the Super Hornet can't take a cat shot with that ordanance load, or has to dump it in the drink to trap. If you are not having fun, you are not doing it right! |
|
| Author: | M21 Sniper [ 12 Feb 2003, 03:30 ] |
| Post subject: | |
"BTW the SH with 4 tanks and a "buddy pod" holds MORE fuel than a KA-6D with 5 tanks and the internal hose reel kit, and stilll has room for 6-8 missles,pods, bombs." And has more drag than a 57 chevy. What do you think the range of an F-18E with all that crap hung on it is going to be? I got a hint: Not far
The F-18E does NOT have nearly the range/loiter of a KA-6D either. Compared to the S-3B it isn't even close in regard to range/loiter. The A-6E/TRAM f returned to the fleet tommorow is a better medium bomber than the F-18E. The range, payload, and integrated TRAM turret of the Intruder is NOT matched by the F-18E, and is BARELY(If it even is) matched by the F-14D. Not producing the A-6F was a bigger mistake than retiring the F-14D, if you ask me. Trample the wounded- hurdle the dead. Edited by - m21 Sniper on Feb 12 2003 02:36 AM |
|
| Author: | M21 Sniper [ 12 Feb 2003, 03:39 ] |
| Post subject: | |
"Yes, I mean the F/A-22" The A is a political tool to get by congress, everyone knows that. "I knew someone would counter with that example" The F-22 was designed purely as the ULTIMATE air supremacy fighter(in fact it is the only aircraft in the world with that mission role- everything else is air superiority). I do not know of even one compromise in the F-22's design that sacrifices any ACM capability for ground attack ability. The F-22 is a THOROUGHBRED of the 1st order. Trample the wounded- hurdle the dead. |
|
| Author: | a10stress [ 12 Feb 2003, 07:08 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Tritonal: Multi-mission means multi compromise. Technology can get you an acceptable compromise, but a dedicated mission design will always kick the multi-missions butt at the design point. Read snipe's comments about the A-6 vs. the F-18E. The 30 year old point design bomb truck is still better at bomb hauling that than the gee whiz F-18E. But hey, it can go supersonic when clean, its got that going for it. We have this crazy configuration of the F-22 where it is carrying 8 fireable missiles internally, 4 600 gal tanks externally and, get this, 8 non-fireable missiles carried on the sides of the pylons. We call it the C-22 configuration. The consensus here is that it is nuts to use the fighter to ferry its own reloads into theater, but they know best. Mc/I + P/A |
|
| Author: | boomer [ 12 Feb 2003, 12:26 ] |
| Post subject: | |
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>The F-22 was designed purely as the ULTIMATE air supremacy fighter(in fact it is the only aircraft in the world with that mission role- everything else is air superiority). <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote> Snipe I guess it depends on WHEN you count the F-22 as begining, because the ATF contract RFP had AG in it from the very start. Stress, I'm aware of that F-22 config, and thought it was one of the dumbest things I have seen!! why not just lengthen the pylons a VERY little and let it carry external AMRAAMS AND tanks for 2nd day air dominance missions!! Even with external stores nothing could touch it!! "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel ! <img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0> |
|
| Author: | M21 Sniper [ 12 Feb 2003, 12:34 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I agree boomer, that it was an original design requirement, however every time there was a decision to be made as to whether to favor ACM or mudd moving, the ACM consideration was the #1 priority. The F-22 is a COMPROMISED strike fighter, but an uncompromised air supremacy fighter. Similar to the F-15C, which can actually carry bombs, but only as a very secondary and never exploited capability. Trample the wounded- hurdle the dead. |
|
| Author: | boomer [ 12 Feb 2003, 12:56 ] |
| Post subject: | |
haha I know what you mean. It's actually funny, the F-22s AG caps are being touted for politicle reasons. And the F-15 (which has always had a somewhat robust AG capability(ask the Irealites LOL) was proffered as "not a pound for air to ground" LOL. wonder if I can find that pic on the net somewhere? "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel ! <img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0> |
|
| Author: | M21 Sniper [ 12 Feb 2003, 18:58 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yup, my point exactly. The difference between a Air superiority fighter and a strike fighter is software and a few hardpoints. The difference between a strike fighter and a air superiority fighter is HUGE. Did i say that right? What i mean is that you can take a dominating ACM platform, add bombs and software and have a credible(at least) strike fighter, but not the other way around. Trample the wounded- hurdle the dead. |
|
| Author: | boomer [ 13 Feb 2003, 01:10 ] |
| Post subject: | |
that's always how I felt it should be done Snipe, start with the ATA reqs, it's a much more difficult set of problems to deal with, THEN you can add AG. "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel ! <img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0> |
|
| Author: | JSF [ 13 Feb 2003, 01:36 ] |
| Post subject: | |
the c-18 to replace the c-130 and the cvf-18 to replace aircraft carriers i got a bad feeling about this |
|
| Author: | M21 Sniper [ 13 Feb 2003, 02:25 ] |
| Post subject: | |
LOL, good to see you in the spirit JSF
Long distance- The next best thing to being there. |
|
| Author: | tritonal [ 13 Feb 2003, 17:31 ] |
| Post subject: | |
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>The F-22 is a THOROUGHBRED of the 1st order. <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote> The F-22 <i>was</i> a thoroughbred of the 1st order. But, I see your point. Edited by - Tritonal on Feb 13 2003 4:33 PM |
|
| Author: | JSF [ 14 Feb 2003, 02:07 ] |
| Post subject: | |
the m18 howitzer AKA kamakaze hornet fired out of the iowa's 16inch barels i got a bad feeling about this |
|
| Author: | M21 Sniper [ 14 Feb 2003, 02:31 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Now THAT would be a cool Hornet JSF. Long distance- The next best thing to being there. |
|
| Author: | JSF [ 14 Feb 2003, 22:03 ] |
| Post subject: | |
thanx i got a bad feeling about this |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|