WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 14 May 2025, 19:05

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2003, 14:28 
Offline
\"Some Pup\"
User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 17:17
Posts: 1022
Location: Missouri
With the incredible accuracy of the JDAMs, the DoD has bee ndeveloping smaller bombs, becuase you don't need as much explosive to gaurantee destruction of the target. Specifically, they have kits for all bombs in the Mk-80 series, and many others, last I knew. The two sizes pertaining to this, the 82(500lbs), and the 250lb(someone confirm, I've heard it called a M-81), used for the small diameter munition, are relevant. The smaller bombs allow more to be carried in bays.

To the point, the smaller size, or more specifically, weight, allows tactical aircraft to carry more. An excellent example of this is the BRU-57s which we now have sitting in their crates, waiting for people to get trained so we can accept them. I've thought about this, and actually asked, why not make a new TER(or even a new MER?), rewired to allow these bombs to be carried? Apparently when I asked Ish, the retiree hired so we ca nask him questions, it didn't click that the smaller munitions in development would be perfect for this. The TERs for the F-16s are supposed to have digital trays, anyway, all it would take is a redo of the tray, enlarging the holes for the rocket plugs for the larger connector, redoing the rocket and CBU cables, and the suff to support the cables during bomb realease. Would a MER be too much harder? I don't know the original issues with those, so bear with me on that one. If you want more, smaller bombs, I'd think that this is a better way to go than something like the BRUs.

Did I make sense, or am I not seeing something here, that I've been told a dozen times, that someone here will finally point out in a way that will let me see it, or am I more messed up than I thought?

"Some pup"
Nickname by Fenderstrat72

_________________
Evil is evil, no matter how small.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2003, 22:03 
Offline

Joined: 05 Oct 2002, 14:22
Posts: 5353
Location: Missouri
http://www.sargentfletcher.com/bus_dev/ngsmer.pdf

"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell

Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel !
<img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0>

_________________
The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Dec 2003, 07:47 
Offline
\"Some Pup\"
User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 17:17
Posts: 1022
Location: Missouri
So are we getting some of those, to go with the BRUs?

"Some pup"
Nickname by Fenderstrat72

_________________
Evil is evil, no matter how small.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Dec 2003, 11:59 
Offline

Joined: 17 Dec 2003, 12:23
Posts: 22
The 250lbs bomb is called the "Small Diamiter Bomb". There will be a glide version a long with the regular version that will have a range of 40 nm.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 24 Dec 2003, 11:01 
Offline

Joined: 11 Dec 2002, 10:13
Posts: 1125
Sorry....no real post here....just trying to get rid of the "frag2" name that shows on the main forum page.....lol

"face it....perhaps your only purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others!"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group