WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 13 May 2025, 23:23

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 15 Oct 2004, 15:06 
Offline

Joined: 12 Oct 2002, 11:09
Posts: 2857
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996541

Genesis crash linked to upside-down design

17:18 15 October 04

NewScientist.com news service


Sensors to detect deceleration on NASA's Genesis space capsule were installed correctly but had been designed upside down, resulting in the failure to deploy the capsule’s parachutes. The design flaw is the prime suspect for why the capsule, carrying precious solar wind ions, crashed in Utah on 8 September, according to a NASA investigation board.

The sensors were a key element in a domino-like series of events designed to release the parachutes. When the capsule - which blazed into the atmosphere at 11 kilometres per second - decelerated by three times the force of gravity (3 Gs), the sensors should have made contact with a spring.

"It's like smashing on the brakes in your car - you feel yourself being pushed forward," says NASA spokesperson Don Savage.

The contact should have continued as the capsule peaked at a deceleration of about 30 Gs. Then, when the capsule’s deceleration fell back through 3 Gs, the contact would have been broken, starting a timer that signalled the first parachute to release.

"But it never made the initial contact because it was backwards," Savage told New Scientist.


Wrong orientation

The sensors, which are estimated to be less than an inch (2.5 centimetres) wide, were apparently installed in a circuit board in the wrong orientation - rotated 180° from the correct direction. But the problem stemmed not from the installation but the design, by Lockheed Martin, based in Bethesda, Maryland.

"They still have to find out why that design error was not caught," says Savage. The mission's Mishap Investigation Board will continue to investigate the problem.

"This single cause has not yet been fully confirmed, nor has it been determined whether it is the only problem within the Genesis system," says the board's chairman Michael Ryschkewitsch. "The board is working to confirm this proximate cause, to determine why this error occurred, why it was not caught by the test programme and an extensive set of in-process and after-the-fact reviews of the Genesis system."

So far, Savage says, the design flaw does not seem to be shared by NASA's Stardust mission, which will use a similar parachute system to deliver samples of a comet to Earth in January 2006.

The $264 million Genesis mission launched in August 2001 to study the composition of the early Solar System, which is thought to be reflected in the solar wind.


Maggie McKee


Return to news story


© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 15 Oct 2004, 16:02 
Offline

Joined: 23 Oct 2002, 20:45
Posts: 2802
DOH!

"The power to Destroy the planet, is insignifigant to the power of the Air Force----Mudd Vader


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 15 Oct 2004, 16:37 
Offline

Joined: 05 Aug 2002, 13:28
Posts: 2210
NASA's pulled multiple "Homers".
I remember hearing that they programmed two different comp lanquages for the Mars satellite(?) and that's how they lossed it. Anyone 'member that a couple years ago?



Edited by - tritonal on Oct 15 2004 3:37 PM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 15 Oct 2004, 22:53 
Offline

Joined: 12 Oct 2002, 11:09
Posts: 2857
NASA needs to commercialize its operations encouraging competition with incentives of profit to stop these screw ups.

Instead of throwing tax dollars down the drain repeatedly with civil service projects. I wonder if some even got fired over this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2004, 10:27 
Offline

Joined: 17 Feb 2003, 15:00
Posts: 117
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
NASA's pulled multiple "Homers".
I remember hearing that they programmed two different comp lanquages for the Mars satellite(?) and that's how they lossed it. Anyone 'member that a couple years ago?
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

It was the Mars Climate Orbiter. At it approached the planet, it was supposed to fire some thrusters to change trajectory and enter orbit. Unfortunately, the programmers failed to convert lbs of rocket thrust to newtons. One lb of thrust is equal to ~4.5 newtons. They thought they were using, say, 450 newtons (100 lbs) of thrust. They were using 450 lbs. You can see the problem here. So the rockets fired, and instead of gently curving into orbit,it hooked a sharp left and sampled the planet's surface rather than its upper atmosphere. LOL. Whoops. Just another smoking hole in NASA's history.

Edited by - thud on Oct 16 2004 09:39 AM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2004, 14:47 
Offline

Joined: 12 Oct 2002, 11:09
Posts: 2857
Hey mudd aren't you glad the rocket scientist weren't designing your f-15.

On the post about the flying pancake, the documentary said the controls were hooked up backwards on one flight.

Seem to remember hearing that the f-100 super saber had some crashes due to a guy on assembly line puting bolts in up side down.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 16 Oct 2004, 20:20 
Offline

Joined: 05 Aug 2002, 13:28
Posts: 2210
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>Hey mudd aren't you glad the rocket scientist weren't designing your f-15. <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

The Thug is best known for taming the Viper.<img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 17 Oct 2004, 00:14 
Offline

Joined: 23 Oct 2002, 20:45
Posts: 2802
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>Hey mudd aren't you glad the rocket scientist weren't designing your f-15. <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

The Thug is best known for taming the Viper.<img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle>


<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

I was unfortunate enough to fly several fixed wing jets.

None were rotary wing until today<img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle> now im happy...22 years later

"The power to Destroy the planet, is insignifigant to the power of the Air Force----Mudd Vader


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 17 Oct 2004, 01:20 
Offline

Joined: 05 Aug 2002, 13:28
Posts: 2210
Helicopters scare me, what with all that <i>chop, chop, chop...</i>


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group