Warthog Territory Forums http://www.warthogterritory.net/forum/ |
|
More SpaceShip 1 http://www.warthogterritory.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=7845 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | 30mike-mike [ 02 Dec 2004, 08:43 ] |
Post subject: | |
The usual "Friend of a friend...etc" Subject: Fw: Mike Melvill - Space Ship 1 > > > > > > From a friend: > > > > I just had the extreme pleasure of speaking with Mike > > Melvill yesterday, the pilot of SpaceShipOne's first two flights above the > > Karman line of 100 km.MSL, and with his wife. He gave a 45 minute > > presentation to the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association conference > > in Long Beach on Thursday, and got a several-minute standing > > ovation. > > I was able to speak with him for a short while after his talk. > > > > Since he was speaking to pilots, he didn't have to translate for the > > "general public" or pull many punches. He spent almost half of his > > time going over the flight controls and the entire cockpit layout > > inside of SpaceShipOne, explaining how it is flown. I think this is > > the first time this has been explained publicly in such detail, and it > > was amazing. There are actually four separate flight regimes, and > > each is flown differently. Just after launch, it flies like a piper > > cub, using a joystick and rudder pedals with mechanical linkages to > > the controls (no hydraulic assists). When it goes supersonic, the > > aerodynamic forces are too high to be able to move the stick, and > > the controls are subject to flutter. So they use an electrically powered > > trim system, flown using the "top hat" switch on the joystick and a > > couple of grips on the arm rest of the pilot's seat. (There are backup > > switches to the left of the instrument panel, which had to be used on > > one flight.) This moves the entire horizontal stabilizers, not just the > > elevons on the trailing edges. Eventually, they get high enough and the > > air gets thin enough that they can again use manual controls, although > > the response is totally different than lower down. > > But that goes away as they exit the atmosphere; the Reaction Control > > System nozzles are then used for maneuvering in space. Coming back > > down, the pilot has to reverse the sequence. There is no automated > > switchover of control systems; the pilot has to remember to move > > from one system to the next at the right times. > > > > The rudder pedals are not linked. Each controls one of the two > > vertical stabilizer rudders separately. You can push both rudder > > pedals at the same time, and get a fairly effective speed brake, > > with both rudders canted outward. Push both fully forward and > > they engage the wheel brakes. But these are not very effective and > > are only really useful for steering input during rollout. The real brake > > is on the nose skid: a piece of maple wood, with the grain aligned > > down the centerline of the airplane. He said it was the most effective > > braking material they could find. > > > > Stephen, we talked about G forces on Tuesday, and I got some of it > > wrong. He says that he gets hit with about 3Gs kicking him backwards > > as soon as he lights the rocket motor. He's supersonic within about 9 > > seconds later. But he immediately starts to pull up into an almost > > vertical climb. So he also gets over 4.3Gs pushing him down into his > > seat just from that maneuver. The combined force is "very stressful" > > and Mike says it's "important not to black out" at that point. He's > > going 1880 knots straight up within 70 seconds. On re-entry, the > > aircraft goes from being absolutely silent while in space to > > generating a deafening roar as it hits the atmosphere again. He's > > going about Mach 3.2 by that time, and has to survive about 5.5Gs > > for over 30 seconds, and lesser G forces for longer than that, as it > > slows back down. It sounds really intense, both as he explains it and > > on the radio. > > > > A couple of interesting side notes: SpaceShipOne has a standard "N" > > registration number; but it is licensed as an experimental "glider". > > Apparently there was a huge bureaucratic hassle trying to license it > > as a rocket powered spacecraft, which they just sidestepped by > > calling it a glider. I asked him if it had a yaw string; he laughed and > > said > > that would have burned off. By the way, the registration number is > > N328KF, where 328K is the number of Feet in 100km. (White Knight is > > N318SL - Burt Rutan's 318th design.) > > > > Mike says that the flight director system (called a TINU) was > > developed completely in-house by a couple of 28-year-old > > programmers, and is absolutely fantastic to fly. That's why they don't > > need > > a yaw string. But I had heard over the radio that Brian Binnie had > > re-booted the TINU just before the landing approach during the X2 > > flight, and it took quite a while for it to come back up. So I asked > > Mike what that was about. He says that during re-entry, the TINU > > loses its GPS lock. So it keeps trying to go back to catch up, > > re-interpolate and compensate for the missing data, and this keeps > > it a little behind in its actual position calculations. The pilot has no > > straight-ahead vision at all, so they have a real issue landing: they > > can't see the runway! The way they do it is to fly directly down the > > runway at 9000 feet; then they do a (military style) break and fly a > > full 360 degree pattern right to the landing. The TINU gives the > > pilot a "blue line" to follow and a target airspeed (which produces > > a given rate of descent). If the pilot follows the blue line, right to > > the break point and through the two 180 degree turns, it will put > > him right onto the runway at what ever touchdown point he selects. > > But the TINU has to be absolutely current when this is going on. So > > at something above 15,000 feet they reboot the TINU and get it > > re-synched with the GPS satellites again before setting up for the > > landing! > > > > He also talked in detail about the rocket motor, and had photos of > > its insides after firing. The nozzle throat actually ablates as the motor > > burns, enlarging the interior throat diameter as the burn progresses. > > He described the problem they had on the June 21 flight: The rocket > > motor nozzle was skewed by about ½ degree to one side. This > > generated a surprisingly high lateral torque trying to turn the aircraft. > > If > > it had been up or down pitch rather than lateral, the controls could > > have handled it; but the lateral yawing forces were too great for Mike to > > compensate as the atmosphere thinned. The result was that he was > > pretty far off course. Mike says he reached apogee, rolled the > > spacecraft over, and was surprised to see the Palmdale VOR directly > > beneath him. That was 30 miles away from Mojave and a long glide > > home. He says its amazing how fast a relatively small deviation can > > produce large distances when you're going Mach 3! > > > > For one of the static burn tests, they had fire and safety crews all > > standing a mile away, ready to duck if anything went wrong. In the > > middle of the test, Mike and Burt Rutan walked up to the front of > > the motor assembly and felt the pressure vessel that contains the N2O. > > Mike knew he was going to have this same thing strapped onto his > > back soon, anyway, and he wanted to know how much it vibrated, how > > hot it got, and how loud it was. It was deafening, literally. It turns out > > that, with the nozzles they use at high altitudes, it's actually not > > that noisy inside the spacecraft. But he still wears hearing protection. > > > > Scaled Composites seem to have fabricated quite a bit of the rocket > > motor themselves, including the N2O tank (which is also the > > structural core of the spacecraft) and the nozzle casings. It would be > > interesting to hear from Michael's friend exactly what parts > > SpaceDev designed and what they manufactured. So, you have trouble. We all have trouble. Build a bridge and get over it. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |