WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 13 May 2025, 23:28

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 25 Jan 2005, 15:19 
Offline

Joined: 29 May 2003, 15:17
Posts: 942
The Tomcat's final flight

F-14 TOMCAT: Randy Monroe of Ram Metals cuts a wing off an F-14 at Oceana Naval Air Station . As the Navy phases out its workhorse, the old planes are dismantled – with reusable parts being kept – and often scrapped. CHRIS TYREE PHOTOS/THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT.


By JACK DORSEY, The Virginian-Pilot
© January 24, 2005

VIRGINIA BEACH — As their 32-year run as the premier Navy fighter begins to wane, the F-14 Tomcats that no one needs are being fed into a junk yard’s shredder, nose first, to become blocks of aluminum for cans, crates, even cars.

The soft gray carcasses lying on a broken concrete tarmac at the northwest corner of Oceana Naval Air Station – not far from the maintenance hangars where they were once kept pristine – is an ugly sight for the Tomcat air crews still flying overhead.

“I try not to look down,” Cmdr. Rick LaBranche, executive officer of the “Tomcatters” of Fighter Squadron 31, said, referring to whenever he flies over Oceana’s “bone yard.”

Stripped of their engines, ejection seats, radar and guns – everything valuable or reusable – the planes barely resemble the $50 million supersonic jets once capable of firing missiles from 100 miles out, winning any aerial dog fight they picked, and dropping precision-guided munitions within inches of their mark.

The F-14s will cease flying in late 2006, when the last of the 633 that were built for the Navy shuts down at Oceana, ending an era that began in the mid-1970s. They were designed to protect the fleet, built primarily to intercept long-range Soviet strike aircraft, once thought to be the Navy’s biggest threat.

Some have been picked to survive as museum artifacts, or sent to military bases for display. Others are being mothballed for war reserve.

The latter group winds up on the desert floor at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ariz., where another 4,500 antiquated planes are kept.

The slow demise of the F-14 at Oceana is painful for the squadron members manning the 79 Tomcats still in use.

Today, teams of mechanics from Titan Systems Corp., including some former F-14 squadron members , have been hired to gut the fighters before they are loaded onto a flatbed trailer and trucked to a Chesapeake scrap yard.

“Yeah, it makes you cry sometimes,” said Melody Hall, a former Navy aviation mechanic and the only woman on the team taking the fighters apart.

Hall, her forearms smudged with grease, used a tiny angled screwdriver to remove some of the hundreds of fasteners securing an aluminum plate before being able to reach one of the plane’s two engines.

“You have to take them out in a certain way, so they don’t wedge down and get stuck,” she said, switching to an electric drill once she cleared the tight quarters behind a landing gear strut.

Along with a team of two or three others, she will spend up to six weeks stripping the plane before it is towed across the field to Oceana’s bone yard.

About 120 F-14s have been taken out of service since 1999, according to William “Taco” Bell, who heads Titan’s Stricken Aircraft Reclamation and Disposal Program at Oceana.

Of those, about 60 have met their fate inside the junk yard’s shredder, 40 were sent to the desert, 12 to museums and eight are displayed at military bases.

Determining which ones get the welder’s torch, and which continue to fly, is based on age, current condition and historical significance.

“Some are 30 years old and have been repaired so many times it is no longer economic to continue to do so,” Bell said.

Others, recently overhauled, may be just 15 years old, and have more life to give.




John Brooks of Titan Systems Corp. removes the avionics from an Oceana Naval Air Station F-14 Tomcat that is slated to be scrapped.


Aircraft log books, pain­stakingly kept by squadron personnel throughout the history of the plane, let Bell know when an F-14 is coming up for a major overhaul, has sustained a stress fracture, flown too many hours or suffered too many hard landings.

Bell sends those jets to the scrap pile.

A computer-generated list tells Bell the planes’ history . Bureau No. 163894 was an F-14D model, built at Grumman’s plant on Long Island, N.Y. It came off the production line Sept. 30, 1990, flew 3,704 flight hours, made 827 catapult takeoffs and 820 cable-arrested landings aboard carriers.

While it used up just half of its estimated 7,000-hour structural life, it would have had to undergo a $1 million overhaul in November to keep flying.

It was ordered scrapped.

“I worked on Tomcats for 30 years and I have a tear in my eye, too,” said Bell, who retired in 1999 as a maintenance officer at Oceana.

But the businessman in him said it is a fact of life: Some have to go.

However, not all is lost. Titan has reclaimed about 500 items per plane, or 6,000 per year since 1999 that the F-14 squadrons can re-use. That’s about 30,500 parts, Bell said, resulting in $17.5 million worth of material being returned to the Navy for use in F-14s, or other aircraft.

A similar process has been used on other worn-out aircraft, such as E-2 Hawkeye radar planes, H-46 Sea Knight helicopters, even early models of the F/A-18 Hornet .

In addition to the 633 F-14s built for the Navy, Grumman produced 80 for Iran, the only foreign nation to receive them. Iran took possession of 79 Tomcats between 1976 and 1979; the last one was never delivered because of the overthrow of the Iranian government.

While several manufacturing plants produced sub sections of the plane, they were all assembled at Grumman’s Calverton plant on Long Island.

There, said John Vosilla, a spokesman for Northrop Grumman, as the corporation is now named, it would take 18 to 24 months to assemble the planes for flight.

Production rates were between 24 and 36 per year – nothing like the 12,275 F-4F Hellcats that Grumman turned out in one year during World War II.



The F-14s that were produced for the Navy included 493 “A” models, some of which were later converted to “B” and “D” models. There were 85 built as “B” models and 55 built as “D” models . The “A” model initially had a what-was-determined-to- be inferior Pratt & Whitney engines, which were retrofitted with higher trust General Electric engines.

The “B” and “D” series included the new engines, plus additional upgrades. There was no “C” model, normally the designation for a single-seat aircraft.




After Brooks salvages some of the reusable parts from a Tomcat, the body is sent to a museum, another base for historical display, mothballed for military reserve or to the scrap yard.

John Griffing, with Northrop Grumman’s field office in Norfolk, recalls his early days with the company serving as a technical representative on the T omcat for about 12 years. He went to sea aboard the carrier Enterprise for the F-14’s first deployment in 1974.

“The only incident was self-induced,” he said. “Somebody left the safety pin in the tailhook and when the guy came back to land he couldn’t get the hook down.”

The ship erected a barricade across the flight deck to catch the errant jet.

“I have a soft spot in my heart for that airplane, just like the Navy folks do,” he said. “It’s a great airplane; unfortunately, it has aged and the technology in it is a couple of generations ago.

“The new Hornets have all the gee-whiz stuff in them.” As Randy Monroe of Ram Metals aimed his Bobcat tractor at the latest hulk resting in Oceana’s bone yard, he said it represented merely another of the 70 or so Tomcats he has cut up.

Monroe powered his tractor across the tarmac, the dull gray nose of the plane screech ing on the concrete pad littered with pieces of junk metal, bolts, hoses, clamps and landing gear. Never mind that the plane was an F-14 that once flew in Fighter Squadron 154 aboard the carrier Kitty Hawk, based in Japan. It likely was called upon to provide force protection and reconnaissance for U.S. and allied forces along the Asian coast.

Monroe, of Mineral Wells, Texas, pushed the plane closer to his acetylene torch so he could reach its wings – they are the first to go.

Cuts along a 2-foot beam, a slice here, another there, dropped the right wing in 15 minutes. Same for the left. A bucket of water kept the smouldering wing from erupting into flames.

Next were the air intakes, then the box beam – a thick titanium structure that holds the fuselage to the wings. It is perhaps the most valuable piece of scrap metal on the plane, said Jody G. Goucher, program supervisor for Titan.

It takes Monroe a full day to rip apart each plane.

Monroe works for free. The Navy lets him sell the scrap aluminum, stainless steel and titanium for his profit.

“I make a little off the plane, not a whole lot,” Monroe said when asked what each hulk fetche s.

The aluminum is nearly worthless, he said. Like most aircraft aluminum , it has a lot of trash in it, he said.

Monroe has been doing this for six years, including ripping apart 30 worn out E-2 Hawkeyes and a few F/A-18 Hornets.

By the time Monroe gets the planes, they are aircraft in form only. Their guts still hold reams of small-gauge electrical wires, still factory white, still tightly wound.

Pigeon droppings coat the tops of the air crew seats. The canopy jettison handle, marked with yellow paint with black stripes, rests untouched.

Yards of quarter-inch-thick stainless steel pipe, which fed hydraulic fluid to moving parts, remained attached to the fuselage.

“It won’t fly no more,” Monroe said after cutting off another wing and loading the wreck on a flatbed trailer.

His Dodge Ram 3500 truck carries the load out Oceana’s main gate, past the hangars, the galley and officers’ club, and on to a Chesapeake scrap yard for its final shredding.

Nothing is to be left intact.

“That’s one of the reasons I’m here, to make sure it never ends up on e Bay,” he said


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2005, 14:38 
Offline

Joined: 05 Dec 2002, 08:53
Posts: 1167
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>A computer-generated list tells Bell the planes’ history . Bureau No. 163894 was an F-14D model, built at Grumman’s plant on Long Island, N.Y. It came off the production line Sept. 30, 1990, <b>flew 3,704 flight hours</b>, made 827 catapult takeoffs and 820 cable-arrested landings aboard carriers.

While it used up just half of its estimated 7,000-hour structural life, it would have had to undergo a $1 million overhaul in November to keep flying.

<b>It was ordered scrapped.</b> <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>


Holy shit! <img src=newicons/anim_shock.gif border=0 align=middle>

THE RAMPTOR ENGINEERING TEAM <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
"Who cares if it works? Does it look good on the ramp?"

Edited by - a10stress on Jan 27 2005 06:49 AM

_________________
????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 26 Jan 2005, 14:57 
Offline

Joined: 11 Dec 2002, 10:13
Posts: 1125
It was just a baby.

"face it....perhaps your only purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2005, 08:35 
Offline

Joined: 05 Aug 2002, 13:28
Posts: 2210
<i>...the F-14 Tomcats that no one needs are being fed into a junk yard’s shredder, nose first, to become blocks of aluminum for cans, crates, even cars.
</i>

So the Pepsi can you're drinking out of could have engaged a Lybian Mig-23 16 years ago in its former life?
...<i>Cool!</i>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2005, 09:15 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2003, 18:48
Posts: 2449
Location: Still fighting the indians in Western Massachusetts
Oh dude that was cold. I worked on a couple of those pepsi cans. You just made me cry.

By this time tomorrow I shall have gained either a pearage or Westminster Abbey........Nelson

_________________
YGBSM !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2005, 10:11 
Offline

Joined: 05 Aug 2002, 13:28
Posts: 2210
Yes, but that's one really cool reincarnation!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2005, 10:59 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2002, 10:29
Posts: 5935
Location: S of St Louis but in IL
Maybe Pepsi or Budwieser could start new ad campaigns and print collectable tail #'s on them!<img src=icon_smile_evil.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=newicons/anim_lol.gif border=0 align=middle>

So, you have trouble. We all have trouble. Build a bridge and get over it.

_________________
\"Those who hammer their guns into plows
will plow for those who do not.\"
- Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2005, 11:40 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2003, 18:48
Posts: 2449
Location: Still fighting the indians in Western Massachusetts
Thats actually a real cool idea. You could do a 1 million dollar gues where in the world this can has been giveaway. Dam Billy thats a great idea.................why thank you me that is a good idea.

By this time tomorrow I shall have gained either a pearage or Westminster Abbey........Nelson

_________________
YGBSM !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2005, 12:32 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2002, 10:29
Posts: 5935
Location: S of St Louis but in IL
Maybe you could float it by Trump and his Pepsi cronies for the next "Apprentice" marketing challenge. For a suitable compensation, of course.<img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle>

So, you have trouble. We all have trouble. Build a bridge and get over it.

_________________
\"Those who hammer their guns into plows
will plow for those who do not.\"
- Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2005, 00:23 
Offline

Joined: 03 May 2003, 13:45
Posts: 75
You know why they are being scrapped instead of sent to Desert Storage at AMARC, dont you? Because these aircraft are a threat to the Navy's pet F-18E/F and JSF projects, since neither of these birds have the legs, lifting capacity, range, speed, G performance, or radar capability of the 15 to 30 year old Tomcats...

Whenever a military aircraft is destroyed as soon as it leaves service, one always knows the brass hats are hiding something...


CAG out...

Edited by - CAG Hotshot on Jan 29 2005 09:59 AM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2005, 09:28 
Offline

Joined: 29 May 2003, 15:17
Posts: 942
CAG I had the same type of thoughts.

IMHO certain people in the USN made a decision to retire many of these aircraft early and they want No One to rescind the decision either uniformed, civilian or Congress.

And Clark is bailing out this summer. I never cared for the guy and my opinion has not changed. Cebrowski is bailing too and I was never fond of him either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2005, 11:52 
Agree with CAG entirely.

<b>"You got me all wrong Mudd...i don't like anyone.</b><img src=newicons/saevil.gif border=0 align=middle>"
<img src="http://worldaffairsboard.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=862&stc=1" border=0>


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2005, 09:23 
Offline

Joined: 28 Feb 2003, 00:18
Posts: 1157
Took the words right out of my mouth CAG...

Makes no sense to scrap a bird with that much life left in her, besides the plans where to start phasing the Tomcat out in 2008...The Tomcats in OIF I understand are putting the 18E/F's to shame...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2005, 11:05 
Offline

Joined: 05 Dec 2002, 08:53
Posts: 1167
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
You know why they are being scrapped instead of sent to Desert Storage at AMARC, dont you? Because these aircraft are a threat to the Navy's pet F-18E/F and JSF projects, since neither of these birds have the legs, lifting capacity, range, speed, G performance, or radar capability of the 15 to 30 year old Tomcats...
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

I think the F-35C might give the F-14 a run for it's money in some of those performance areas, especially lifting capacity, range and maneuverability, well, on paper anyway.

THE RAMPTOR ENGINEERING TEAM <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
"Who cares if it works? Does it look good on the ramp?"

_________________
????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2005, 12:07 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2002, 10:29
Posts: 5935
Location: S of St Louis but in IL
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>on paper anyway <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Ok, so how much paper <i>can</i> it carry, and how far can it carry it? <img src=icon_smile_clown.gif border=0 align=middle>

So, you have trouble. We all have trouble. Build a bridge and get over it.

_________________
\"Those who hammer their guns into plows
will plow for those who do not.\"
- Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2005, 14:48 
Offline

Joined: 05 Dec 2002, 08:53
Posts: 1167
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
Ok, so how much paper can it carry, and how far can it carry it?
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

I figure it can carry 3000 lbs of New York Times to the Yucca Flatts nuclear waste dump without tanking. The people of Nevada might be upset with dumping that vile pollution in their state though. First nuclear waste, and now this.

THE RAMPTOR ENGINEERING TEAM <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
"Who cares if it works? Does it look good on the ramp?"

_________________
????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2005, 17:10 
Offline

Joined: 28 Feb 2003, 00:18
Posts: 1157
I agree Stress....The F-35C promises to bring back the medium strike ability that was to some degreee lost with the A-6E and will be extinct when the last F-14 is made into a beer can...The F-18E/F gives the Navy alot of capabilities, reaching out and touching the bad guys is not one of them...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2005, 17:14 
Offline

Joined: 23 Oct 2002, 20:45
Posts: 2802
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>The F-18E/F gives the Navy alot of capabilities, reaching out and touching the bad guys is not one of them <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

Let me know who the bad Guys are.

IF we end up East of Iraq in the current administration. We shall find out if its up to snuff.

"...some people will find any reason to complain. there's no pleasing some people. fuck it. living life makes more sense than thinking life. fuck it all and fucking no regrets. get over it. life moves on"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 07 Feb 2005, 23:08 
Offline

Joined: 03 May 2003, 13:45
Posts: 75
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
I agree Stress....The F-35C promises to bring back the medium strike ability that was to some degreee lost with the A-6E and will be extinct when the last F-14 is made into a beer can...The F-18E/F gives the Navy alot of capabilities, reaching out and touching the bad guys is not one of them...


<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

In the air to air (not air to ground)arena, considering that the F-14 had a single handful of kills thoughout its entire shipboard life, I will reserve opinions on the Super Horror's capabilites in these matters.

Also the AIM-54 doesnt exactly have a rep as a killer, unless you count plodding test drones... At least the AMRAAM has a good BVR kill record superior to anything the Tomcat ever carried in its long life...

In the air to ground area, the lack of long range weapons on the F-14 also limits its ability to hit distant targets to having to fly the entire way there to hit it with its close range weapons. The capabilites and extensive weapons of the SH in this regard rather outweight its limited range for specific standoff engagements...

However I do fully agree that th F-35 will likely be superior in all aspects to the Super Horror...

Except in surviving battle damage with its single engine...

And as a final thought, if the Tomcat had gone though all the updates requested, instead of the SH being produced, it would have been superior to the SH in every respect, but that battle was fought and lost over 12 years ago...


CAG out...


Edited by - CAG Hotshot on Feb 07 2005 10:13 PM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 09 Feb 2005, 14:08 
"Also the AIM-54 doesnt exactly have a rep as a killer, unless you count plodding test drones... At least the AMRAAM has a good BVR kill record superior to anything the Tomcat ever carried in its long life..."

You REALLY need to look at the work of the F-14/AIM-54 in the hands of the Iranians.

The F-14/Phoenix dominated that air war.

<b>"You got me all wrong Mudd...i don't like anyone.</b><img src=newicons/saevil.gif border=0 align=middle>"
<img src="http://worldaffairsboard.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=862&stc=1" border=0>


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 09 Feb 2005, 14:55 
Offline

Joined: 23 Oct 2002, 20:45
Posts: 2802
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
"Also the AIM-54 doesnt exactly have a rep as a killer, unless you count plodding test drones... At least the AMRAAM has a good BVR kill record superior to anything the Tomcat ever carried in its long life..."

You REALLY need to look at the work of the F-14/AIM-54 in the hands of the Iranians.

The F-14/Phoenix dominated that air war.

<b>"You got me all wrong Mudd...i don't like anyone.</b><img src=newicons/saevil.gif border=0 align=middle>"
<img src="http://worldaffairsboard.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=862&stc=1" border=0>

<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>

Against Low G manuever Fighters that Did not have the Defensive Rawr systems of the 90's Russian Aircraft Modifications.

The point being, If you cant indicate a bearing line to notch. You cant beam a manuevering Missile.

Many A2A BVR Kills have been proven to show that the Defending aircrew was unaware of launch, and secondly system deficiencies prevented them from Defeating or knowing in sufficient time that they could Trash the inbound missiles effectiveness.

Poor training is the Single biggest indicator.

The Defending fighters only had 1 Indication Source Radar Bearing Line. and Signal Strength to Strobbing radar.

What happens here when employing a powerful radar of the F14. The Mig believes it is Out of Range or in the WVR stage of the fight, Secondly it doesnt know what aircraft is out there, as their is no NCTR function in the aircraft.

"RickUSN-

That was intelligent and useful Mudd.

But it certainly is what Ive come to expect.

Mindless babbling with no intent to either enlighten or inform.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Feb 2005, 21:07 
Offline

Joined: 14 Feb 2005, 23:44
Posts: 39
Tom Cooper lists 159 confirmed kills by IIRAF F-14's against Iraq in his book about the Iranian F-14's units in combat. The kills ranged from a few large targets like Tu-22B, B-6D (liscense built Tu16s), and even a C601 Chinese anti-ship missile, but the vast majority of those aerial kills were against Su-22, MiG-23, Mirage F-1, Mig-25, and MiG-21's of the Iraqi Air Force. Sure some of those must have been easy kills but it's clear to see that the Iranian F-14's dominated the aerial war against Iraq during the 8 year war.

The USN never realized the true potential of the F-14 until far after it's fate was sealed, and not even the USAF's F-15 can claim the success that the Iranian's had with the F-14 in A/A kills. I totally agree - there are those that be that simply do not want the general taxpayer and registered voter to become aware of just how bad a mistake it was to cancel the F-14 program when they did.



Edited by - Krieger on Feb 18 2005 8:19 PM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2005, 13:08 
Offline

Joined: 28 Feb 2003, 00:18
Posts: 1157
Tom is a bit high on his kill tally, I would speculate that the truth lies somewhere between what the USN party line is, and what Cooper suggests in his book. The USN was able to make the F-14 one of the worlds best aircraft by the high proffiency of its maintenence personal, I really seriously doubt that the post revolution Islamic Republic of Iran Airforce would be able to generate the sorties with the Tomcat that the USN could, remember that many of those F-14's had the PW TF-30P-12 powerlants, which had huge issues that where sort of remedied with the PW TF-30P-14. There is no doubt that the F-14 despite the lack of quality personal was effective against Saddam's Iraq, A tribute to the weapons system, but again this makes me wonder about the quality of the people Iraq was strapping in their aircraft using the Soviet ground control way of prosecuting aerial combat. I guess my whole point here is that a big reason why western designs have been so sucessfull to a large degreee is the people we have, and the doctrin they follow. After the Shah was exiled most of his quality people where purged. As a result the IRIAF never used the western tactics that the F-14 was designed around. From my independent research, take it for what its worth, the number that keeps comming up is around 40-60 kills, with a few Tomcat losses...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2005, 15:59 
Offline

Joined: 23 Oct 2002, 20:45
Posts: 2802
...Im Curious what one of them Modified Hawk Sams would do as an A2a Weapon that IRAN modified for the F14.

"RickUSN-

That was intelligent and useful Mudd.

But it certainly is what Ive come to expect.

Mindless babbling with no intent to either enlighten or inform.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Feb 2005, 17:54 
Offline

Joined: 05 Oct 2002, 14:22
Posts: 5353
Location: Missouri
From what I understand they didnt work out very well and the program was dropped.

"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us". George Orwell

Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel !
<img src="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/atengun2X.GIF" border=0>

_________________
The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group