WT Forums

Home | WT Forums | Hogpedia | Warthog blog | Hosted sites
It is currently 14 May 2025, 00:43

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 14 Jul 2005, 20:52 
Offline
Warthog VFW
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2002, 14:02
Posts: 6162
Location: IL
Do they stillfly the F-5's as agressors?
Reason I ask is comming back from the Dr yesterday our Airport had one on the ramp.
In blue cammo with the red number on its nose,couldnt make it out,but it looked like the one that they had on all the litho's back in the 80's 52 was its number I think.

Wish I had a camera with me <img src=newicons/anim_cussing.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_dissapprove.gif border=0 align=middle>

Goose

_________________
\"Live Free Or Die\"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 15 Jul 2005, 05:37 
Offline
Farfrompukin
User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2003, 12:54
Posts: 941
Location: Germany
They bought 32 F-5E from Switzerland in 2003.

Loading:
<img src="http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y82/homer32/f5e.bmp" border=0>


<img src="http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y82/homer32/f5e2.bmp" border=0>

(photos found on www.flugzeugforum.de)

Quote:
Pentagon Contract Announcement

(Source: US Department of Defense; issued Feb. 14, 2003)

The government of Switzerland is being awarded an estimated $18,557,950 firm-fixed-price contract for the procurement of up to 32 low-flight-time F-5E Tiger aircraft.

The base award of $570,950 is for the initial requirement of one
aircraft. The contract consists of a basic award and five options.

These F-5E Tiger aircraft will provide for a one-on-one replacement of current U.S. Navy Reserve F-5E aircraft. Revised fatigue life extended calculations necessitated restructuring of the previous overhaul program to provide for the cost-effective procurement of these replacement aircraft to achieve the CNO directed operational requirements through FY 2015.

Work will be performed in Switzerland and is to be completed in August 2003.

If all options are exercised, the work will be completed in September 2007. Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year.
This contract was not competitively procured.

The Naval Air Systems Command Headquarters, Patuxent River, Md., is the contracting activity

http://www.tailslides.co.uk/Aggressors/VFC-13/Swiss%20F5E.htm


"Did you know? You can use your old motor oil to fertilize your lawn! -- Environmental Protection Agency."

http://www.reelwavs.com/movies/dumb_and ... dumb13.wav



Edited by - homer32 on Jul 15 2005 12:46 PM

_________________
\"My name's Pitt, and you ain't talkin' your ass outta this shit.\"

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 15 Jul 2005, 13:13 
Offline

Joined: 05 Oct 2002, 14:22
Posts: 5353
Location: Missouri
IF I remember right they dumped the F-5s for 16s and 18s, then bought the F-5s again because maintainance and fuel for the new fighters was spending them out of house and home lol

Fighting For Justice With Brains Of Steel !
<img src="http://publish.hometown.aol.com/boomer0400/images/wooplate.jpg" border=0><img src="http://publish.hometown.aol.com/boomer0400/images/fal_avatar02.jpg" border=0>

_________________
The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 15 Jul 2005, 13:15 
Offline
Hog Driver

Joined: 08 Dec 2002, 10:36
Posts: 593
Fallon still has them for the USN, and Yuma still has them (most of the ex-Nellis birds) for the USMCR.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 15 Jul 2005, 20:42 
Offline
Warthog VFW
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2002, 14:02
Posts: 6162
Location: IL
Then he was on his way to an airshow or something.
The F-5 to me like some of the F- 100'S SERIES were what a fighter was supposed to look like.
Not saying the new ones dont but the F-5E was like a HOTROD.

I still think the USAF should of bought at least a few squadrons
of F-20's,I was at Osan AB the day before the one crashed on its tour of the far east.

gOOSE

_________________
\"Live Free Or Die\"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 15 Jul 2005, 21:17 
Offline
WT Game Warden
User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2003, 18:48
Posts: 2449
Location: Still fighting the indians in Western Massachusetts
The F5 rocked. One of the best looking fighters ever built. I agree the F20 would have been a great strictly homeland defense fighter.

By this time tomorrow I shall have gained either a pearage or Westminster Abbey........Nelson

_________________
YGBSM !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Jul 2005, 13:20 
Offline

Joined: 24 Nov 2003, 18:10
Posts: 375
Yep, the Tigershark would have been great at DACT/ homeland defense. Very capable for its size and cheap to own and operate. Put a flight of two at most smaller commercial airports and a flight of four at the major ones and we'd be all set.

"Nobody ever won a war dying for their country. You win wars by making the other son of a bitch die for his." - George S. Patton.
My motto: pacis per vires


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 21 Jul 2005, 05:58 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2002, 10:29
Posts: 5935
Location: S of St Louis but in IL
Then there's "Top Gun".<img src=icon_smile_evil.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=newicons/anim_lol.gif border=0 align=middle>

"Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together...." - Carl Zwanzig

_________________
\"Those who hammer their guns into plows
will plow for those who do not.\"
- Thomas Jefferson


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group