| Warthog Territory Forums https://www.warthogterritory.net/forum/ |
|
| Bradley Vs. Warrior https://www.warthogterritory.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=3109 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | JSF [ 03 May 2003, 06:30 ] |
| Post subject: | |
one on one, in a desert enviroment which would win the brithish warrior or the US bradley? vader: Obi-wan never told you what happend to your father luke:he told me enough, he told me you killed him vader: no luke i am yor father |
|
| Author: | CAG Hotshot [ 03 May 2003, 13:45 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Warrior has no gun ports for its load of troops and I believe no ATGM capability (It didnt used to, but that may have changed). It has superior NBC protection (due to less access points) is of lower silhouette, however has no long range weapons comparable to the TOW II missile... |
|
| Author: | M21 Sniper [ 03 May 2003, 20:36 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Warrior has Chobham armor. Bradley's armor is spaced steel/aluminum. If the bottom line is protection, the Warrior is definitely better protected. "If they mean to have a war, let it begin here." Captain John Parker, Battle of Lexington. |
|
| Author: | tritonal [ 05 May 2003, 22:43 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Warrior has Chobahm? 'Must weigh alot!? I'll go check. |
|
| Author: | Horrido [ 05 May 2003, 23:45 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Modern Bradleys don't have firing ports, either. Eliminated with the additional steal armor they bolted onto them with the M2A2. A sucking chest wound is life's way of telling you to slow down... |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|