<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
TG, I may be wrong but it has been my observation from the enlisted side of the house Academy Grads are not the same quality now as they were 22 years ago when I came in. It used to be you could pick out the AFA grads by their professionalism. Now you can still do it but for the most part it is by their lack of professionalism. The most unprofessional, immature Capt I have ever seen graduated from the AFA. The 2nd Lt's coming out of their are still acting like high schoolers. Maybe it because I am getting older or just fed up with the way things are now. However I hold on to my belief that the AFA produced better officers years ago than it is now. In the maintenance world I have seen numerous proir enlisted become excellent officers recently to the point they outshine their AFA conterparts. Oh well come on Jun 05, my retirement date.
Fender
"A woman drove me to drink
and I hadn't even the courtesy to thank her".
W.C. Fields
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
IMO, the different service academy's are a waste of infrastructure $$$ for the DOD. If I were king for a day, I'd want to close the USAF, USN, and West Point as-such, and consolidate them into a "US Military Academy (which of the physical sites TBD). That way, everyone can get the same training their 1st and 2nd year, then branch off into their particular service for their 3rd/4th year. You put in a dream sheet for the service you'd like to be in, and you're selected from a combination of needs of the service, what's available, and your dream sheet. I'd still retain the US Merchant Marine and USCG Academy's since they're specialized to their own non-DOD mission (aside from the USCG/DOD wartime relationship).
|