<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>I don't see why a totalitarian government needs any internal public relations projects <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
I'm not an expert in the region, but I do travel to the CIS and Far East quite a bit.
It has always struck me as odd how exactly the sort of regimes that wouldn't need stiring symbols of national pride to keep the government in charge seem to put them up everywhere.
I came to the conclusion that they do it because they can.
In our societies government excess with regards statues and fancy (but utterly useless) buildings would eventually be rejected by the general population and the governmant in question would be voted out next time round.
In these totalitarian states they seem the get off on sticking it to the down-troden and hungry population and saying, you might want a new hospital or food for your kids, but we're going to spend the money on a new statue of Mao's dog.
In fact in the Middle East the beautification of the Gulf States has reached a frenzy of competion which is frankly rediculous even when you have as much money sloshing about as they do.
Libya is another good example, symbols to the greatness of Mad Dog and the Libyan state everywhere you look and the streets stink of sewage.
I'm not saying the military aspect doesn't come into it and you would know more than me, but does anybody really think they need to posture in front of the States. You could squash them like a bug if the going got nasty. I mean really nasty where conventional war was no longer on option.
You're born, you keep your head down and you die. If you're lucky...
|